Willy is done back to the old rumor that if everything were checked out closely, Obama does not even meet the qualifications for the Presidency of the United States.
Born to foreign parents, born in questionable American Soil, questionable about why his name is Hussein.
Willy just thinks there has to be reason out there that he is not qualified.
Willy is scared. What about you?
10-4 Willy
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Obama - qualified?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Oh Willy...Rumor it is...Once again...So misleading...What a shame...His mother was from Wichita Kansas... Just what exactly do you consider foriegn?...When does the state of Hawaii become questionable american soil? He got his name from his father who was from Kenya...Of course you already know all of this...It's just that old desperate, republican seed of fear being planted once again...but guess what? I'm not afraid...I'm just fed up...Do you really honestly believe that if there was any truth at all to these silly, flimsy accusations, that it would have not been proven by the gop and therefore prevented him from running for POTUS? Give me a break!!LOL! Don't be afraid Willy...the truth will set you free!
Here is how it works:
Party A serves party B with a list of questions to admit or deny.
Party B has a certain time frame to either admit or deny those
questions. If no answer is filed within the time frame (usually 30
days) the questions are deemed admitted.
see-
Rule 36. Requests for Admission
(a) Scope and Procedure.
(1) Scope. A party may serve on any other party a written
request to admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth
of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1) relating to:
(A) facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about
either; and
(B) the genuineness of any described documents.
(2) Form; Copy of a Document. Each matter must be separately
stated. A request to admit the genuineness of a document must be
accompanied by a copy of the document unless it is, or has been,
otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying.
(3) Time to Respond; Effect of Not Responding.
A matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after being
served, the party to whom the request is directed serves on the
requesting party a written answer or objection addressed to the
matter and signed by the party or its attorney. A shorter or longer
time for responding may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be ordered
by the court.
(4) Answer. If a matter is not admitted, the answer must
specifically deny it or state in detail why the answering party
cannot truthfully admit or deny it. A denial must fairly respond to
the substance of the matter; and when good faith requires that a
party qualify an answer or deny only a part of a matter, the answer
must specify the part admitted and qualify or deny the rest. The
answering party may assert lack of knowledge or information as a
reason for failing to admit or deny only if the party states that it
has made reasonable inquiry and that the information it knows or can
readily obtain is insufficient to enable it to admit or deny.
(5) Objections. The grounds for objecting to a request must be
stated. A party must not object solely on the ground that the
request presents a genuine issue for trial.
(6) Motion Regarding the Sufficiency of an Answer or
Objection. The requesting party may move to determine the
sufficiency of an answer or objection. Unless the court finds an
objection justified, it must order that an answer be served. On
finding that an answer does not comply with this rule, the court may
order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer
be served. The court may defer its final decision until a pretrial
conference or a specified time before trial. Rule 37(a)(5) applies
to an award of expenses.
(b) Effect of an Admission; Withdrawing or Amending It. A
matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless
the court, on motion, permits the admission to be withdrawn or
amended. Subject to Rule 16(e), the court may permit withdrawal or
amendment if it would promote the presentation of the merits of the
action and if the court is not persuaded that it would prejudice the
requesting party in maintaining or defending the action on the
merits. An admission under this rule is not an admission for any
other purpose and cannot be used against the party in any other
proceeding.
So here is how this plays out:
the allegations made in the request for production would be
considered admitted and the plaintiff would be entitled to proceed
in some form of summary judgment or judgment on the pleading motion
and would prevail.
I would venture to bet that if in fact BHO's atty and the DNC's
attorney did not answer in time they will be filing a motion to
extend time or set aside the default. It truly would be legal
malpractice not to answer- unless of course the answer would end the
case.
It will be interesting from a legal perspective. I will look into
this some more and see what I can find out.
Willy knows that this is all bullpucky. Willy should get a life.
The Real Truth about Barack Obama's Citizenship!
I would be scared. It's a disgrace he's come this far. But I have faith that America is smarter than he planned on. :)
Kansas is a foreign country? Hawaii is a foreign country?
Right and Sarah Palin can see Russia from her front porch.
I bet you didn't get an 'A' in geography, Willie!
I'll be glad when this election is over. I'm so tired of the mug slinging and the name calling. And I'm talking about bloggers. Have a great day Willy. :)
Willy scares easily. Willy needs his meds :)
Thanks to Medicare, he can get them.
Post a Comment